Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-10/msg00328.html

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-10/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/ yesterday
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 13709 (+139)
build-tried: 13698 (+137)
build-failed: 35 (-6)
build-n-a: 129 (-4)
build-succeeded: 13534 (+147)
build-official-failed+na: 189 (-5)
build-compare-failed: 417 (+5)
build-compare-succeeded: 13117 (+142)
verify-failed: 518 (+8)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12784 (+261)
bit-by-bit-identical: 12990 (+135)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 537 (+5)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 544 (+12)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201127/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
49 were in ring1

That makes it 52/3215 => 1.62 %
which is below the overall average of
417/13534 => 3.08 %

537/13534 => 3.97 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


noteworthy findings:
  procmail https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/850841 verification error from preinstallimage that had different groups

eigen3 docs can build reproducibly with new doxygen


newly unreproducible packages in ring1:

cilium filesystem readdir order issues

apache-commons-codec javadoc issues

go1.15 still suffering from parallelism-induced buildid variations that might be fixed when building with go1.15 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/42159