Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/ZGSD5CLQCSJXKK5LRWICFPZ4HZOREIJX/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-04/

This time I spent most time on rebuilding and fixing issues in 15.3
https://rb.zq1.de/leap/15.3/
It was a bit more difficult, because older SLE binaries do not get rebuilt, and even Leap is split between Backports and Leap project.
I also ran my scripts on https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Step:FrontRunner to check what stops building there and found many issues.


I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14026 (+71)
build-tried: 13989 (+44)
build-failed: 58 (-5)
build-n-a: 164 (-9)
build-succeeded: 13767 (+58)
build-official-failed+na: 398 (+136)
build-compare-failed: 365 (-1)
build-compare-succeeded: 13402 (+59)
verify-failed: 468 (-27)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12588 (-372)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13126 (-65)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 641 (+106)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 641 (+123)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
46 were in ring1

That makes it 49/3247 => 1.51 %
which is below the overall average of
which is below the overall average of
365/13767 => 2.65 %

641/13767 => 4.66 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


newly unreproducible core packages:
kopete is again/still unreproducible from
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186

python-pandas suffers from the usual .pyc non-determinism

javassist has filesys-order-related variations in javadoc index-all.html


Ciao
Bernhard M.