Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/S5CIAMYJAEHKTPUDWI5U6YGZDTUP46TT/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-11/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14268 (+5)
build-tried: 14238 (+5)
build-failed: 31 (-3)
build-n-a: 296 (+9)
build-succeeded: 13911 (-1)
build-official-failed+na: 36 (-18)
build-compare-failed: 406 (+9)
build-compare-succeeded: 13505 (-10)
verify-failed: 454 (-5)
verified-semi-reproducible: 13134 (-54)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13467 (+39)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 440 (-38)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 444 (-40)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20211231/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
5 were in ring0
35 were in ring1

That makes it 40/3247 => 1.23 %
which is below the overall average of
406/13911 => 2.92 %

440/13911 => 3.16 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible

unreproducible packages in ring0(bootstrap):
bison PGO
gcc10 PGO
grep PGO
pam PDF/date
python38 PGO

Ciao
Bernhard M.