Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/OJBHWNPNEN4HXDRTUP2UWS3SXQCIRQKV/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-08/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 14153 (+26)
build-tried: 14123 (+25)
build-failed: 39 (+14)
build-n-a: 292 (+77)
build-succeeded: 13792 (-66)
build-official-failed+na: 167 (+52)
build-compare-failed: 386 (+13)
build-compare-succeeded: 13406 (-79)
verify-failed: 462 (-7)
verified-semi-reproducible: 13194 (+68)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13294 (+73)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 500 (-128)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 498 (-139)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
4 were in ring0
38 were in ring1

That makes it 42/3247 => 1.29 %
which is below the overall average of
386/13792 => 2.80 %

500/13792 => 3.63 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible

I have been busy with other work, so not much progress on openSUSE reproducible builds.

Newly unreproducible core packages:

* openssl-1_0_0
* librsvg

Ciao
Bernhard M.