Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/2ZZQJOZ2CYKLL2AVC7NBFRDWB57K5JKU/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-11/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 13841 (+132)
build-tried: 13830 (+132)
build-failed: 32 (-3)
build-n-a: 129 (+0)
build-succeeded: 13669 (+135)
build-official-failed+na: 169 (-20)
build-compare-failed: 423 (+6)
build-compare-succeeded: 13246 (+129)
verify-failed: 511 (-7)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12784 (+0)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13119 (+129)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 550 (+13)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 550 (+6)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201231/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
50 were in ring1

That makes it 53/3247 => 1.63 %
which is below the overall average of
423/13669 => 3.09 %

550/13669 => 4.02 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build/pull/634 added the option to have a filesystem with deterministic readdir order and Dominique enabled it in Factory some weeks ago, so packages such as cargo-c, gcompris, qt6* are now verifiable. This can benefit up to 111 packages, though several of them still have other issues to solve.


Newly unreproducible core packages:
qemu
     assembler diffs ; needs debugging